Sometimes things happen and sometimes we make things happen, but most importantly things happen. So will things happen irrespective of what we think or do or rather want may be for those on a higher level of thinking and gifted vision attributes perceive.
Some say keep thinking of the thing and it will happen some say think start doing and it will happen, some also say that things will happen only when they are supposed to so we should keep doing what we are and like Charlie Sheen puts it 'something will turn up'.
That brings me destiny or des tiny, considering des in french would just be some one name tiny. But is it really tiny or makes up a big part in our life may be our reason for existence.
In India, since ancient times destiny has assumed quite a big role.
In some contexts it has been used to humble the doer(directly taken as 'karta').
In a sense that he is responsible for the events and consequences but its not only him but also some other things greater than him or rather which are beyond his control which are contributing to the end result. So in failure its not the absolute failure of the doer and in success its not the absolute success of the doer, rather a combination of all these elements which have given the results. May not have been favourable.
If we do nothing we don't get anything is what is said atleast. But is it necessarily true ?
Some say keep thinking of the thing and it will happen some say think start doing and it will happen, some also say that things will happen only when they are supposed to so we should keep doing what we are and like Charlie Sheen puts it 'something will turn up'.
That brings me destiny or des tiny, considering des in french would just be some one name tiny. But is it really tiny or makes up a big part in our life may be our reason for existence.
In India, since ancient times destiny has assumed quite a big role.
In some contexts it has been used to humble the doer(directly taken as 'karta').
In a sense that he is responsible for the events and consequences but its not only him but also some other things greater than him or rather which are beyond his control which are contributing to the end result. So in failure its not the absolute failure of the doer and in success its not the absolute success of the doer, rather a combination of all these elements which have given the results. May not have been favourable.
If we do nothing we don't get anything is what is said atleast. But is it necessarily true ?
